
The Corporation, Donor's hall, Contact editors, Relations with Investors, Publication Folders, Exhibitions, Home
Journal, Publication Notices, International Relation Square, Epistemology Circle, Kierkegaardian triangle
|
Dear Sir, Dear Madam, Yes, indeed. There are actually two kinds
of situation, of which the discrimination implies the existence or not of a
third party. Let us proceed with care and method so as to attain clarity in our
very own formulations. The first branch of the alternative is
that your paper has not already been published elsewhere and so that you
are in the seek for an editor. In this case we can become the elected one, or
more precisely, one of us may become the elected one. For this to happen, we
need to have some material submitted to us to decide whether to get involved in
a publication or not. Without being too righteous about
words, well why should we not after all we are editors, so being righteous
about words we cannot intake manuscripts. We do have an e-based business
principle which implies that all communications with us should be wired (even
though the first connection may be wireless). What we can do, however is to
intake weepy-scripts, if this new concept should cover the idea of an original
piece of writing having been word-processed. The ideal support, for it is universal
and does not carry along licensing issues, is the .htm (or .html) file. It is
not true that a decent layout in this format cannot be achieved. It is not
true... For more extensive papers – over, say, 10 american letters or european
A4 pages, processed in say 10 or 12 Times New Roman or equivalent – an abstract
is required, is a mandatory requirement. Not exceeding a single page of
the same formatting, the abstract shall be. The choice of its content is at the
discretion of the Author, which means he or she is free, for example, either to
properly abstract a page in the corpus of the submitted work which he or she
believes to be a strong argument in favour of a publication, or to present or
represent the overall structuring principle of the work which a sheer abstract
risk to betray. Whichever other solution we should have failed to mention as a
possible manner to advocate for the publication of an extensive paper in the
restrictive form of a single page is of course acceptable. We intend not to
limit our Authors' or
Author's-to-be (Author-to-be's?) creativity by no means, we would assure. Make
sure however to mention somewhere in the accompanying e-letter or e-mail that
it would be a first publication of the submitted (virtual) paper. The second kind of cases – for each
case is naturally a single and seminal event – when you already have an editor
or when you are yourself the editor of a paper (a real paper) which you would
like to discuss the terms for an additional publication – an electronic
publication by Hidepark21 Publications. Well
this case is a rather more complicated one, although not everly wanting
a solution. The general form of the possible solution is a commercial contract
between the original editor and the ourself. Since according to our status,
only partner editors are authorised to proceed to such commercial contracting
in the name of Hidepark21 Publications with
external editors, the transaction should necessarily imply one of them. It
would further imply the Author for it is in Hidepark21.org general policies
that Authors should always be associated with any of the transactions
concerning their works, even though he might have granted his original editor
with a unlimited licence to act in his name. The material to be submitted in this
case depends a bit on the nature of the document to be associatedly published
by us. In the case of an article in a paper journal, magazine, review or other
periodical publication, the article, an abstract and the terms of association jointly proposed by the pair
editor-author should be wired. Now in the case of a real, eventual extensive
nature, typically a book of sorts,
a somewhat more substantial abstract (10 to 20 pages' summary, a couple
of chapters' abstract, ?) and the terms are wired with the mention "book
publication" visible somewhere in the document. If interested by the terms
and the abstract we will contact you for further discussion which may and
probably would imply an exception to the purely e-based principle of communication. Either an original publication or a
complementory e-publication, there is only one address to send your applicative
documents to: editors@hidepark21.org. Thank you for the interest for our publishing abilities your reading the present words suggests. In the name of all the independent editors at Hidepark21.org, I should like to assure that we are Yours faithfully, Mederic L. Pascal Partner Editor Document
last revised on |